The last movies scene was very different from the rest. In the first one, the director made it very unrealistic, all the fire and the earth shaking made it seem a bit too much. The ghost was dressed in aurmor which looked better, it was a way of saying he was prepared to fight. The second movie has more of a calmer approach. Hamlet leaving the party for a while and running into this ghost of his father one on one. This ghost didnt have armour but there wasnt any fire our ground destruction, they were simply on a balcony and it seemed more realistic but the music choice gave it more of a sullen feeling. In the sencond one and first Hamlet was angered and swore for revenge. In the third movie, a more modern version where Hamlet was able to touch his father as the ghost also used a napkin as a prop to show the wound that couldnt be healed as he kept on wiping his ear. All these directors had different thoughts when they made this but i choose the second movie to capture the true meaning and stay natural and believable to all.
You had really good points. For instance, the napkin scene and its symbolism. I agree on the first scene, how the director dramatized the film a little bit.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you said about the second scene, its way more realistic then the first. I want to see him get revenge.
ReplyDelete